Οι δύο ορισμοί της συντηρητικής δύναμης : μία αντίφαση

Καλησπέρα σε όλους!

(Λήμμα Poincare)

Ah, Poincaré’s Lemma! It’s a really neat result in vector calculus and differential geometry that essentially tells us when we can find a “potential” for a vector field whose curl is zero. You could think of it as a sort of inverse operation to the curl, under certain conditions.
Here’s the gist of it, specifically in the context of the curl in three dimensions:
Poincaré’s Lemma (for Curl):
If a vector field F is defined on a simply connected open region U in R3 and its curl is zero everywhere in U (i.e., ∇×F=0), then there exists a scalar potential function ϕ defined on U such that F is the gradient of ϕ:
F=∇ϕ
In simpler terms:
If you have a vector field that has no “swirling” or “vorticity” (which is what the curl measures), and the region where this field is defined has no “holes” (simply connected), then you can always find a scalar function whose gradient gives you back your original vector field.
Key Concepts:

• Closed Form: In the language of differential forms, a vector field with zero curl corresponds to a “closed 1-form”.
• Exact Form: A vector field that can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential corresponds to an “exact 1-form”.
• Simply Connected Region: A region is simply connected if every closed loop within the region can be continuously shrunk to a point within that same region. Think of a solid ball versus a torus (doughnut shape, which has a hole). Poincaré’s Lemma requires the region to be simply connected. If the region has holes, a vector field with zero curl might not have a globally defined scalar potential.
• Gradient: The gradient of a scalar function ϕ(x,y,z) is the vector field ∇ϕ=(∂x∂ϕ​,∂y∂ϕ​,∂z∂ϕ​). The curl of any gradient is always zero (∇×(∇ϕ)=0), this is a standard vector identity. Poincaré’s Lemma provides a converse to this under specific conditions.

Why is this important?
This lemma is fundamental in physics, particularly in areas like:

• Conservative Forces: If a force field F has zero curl, it implies that the force is conservative. This means that the work done by the force in moving a particle between two points is independent of the path taken, and we can define a potential energy function U such that F=−∇U.
• Electromagnetism: In electrostatics, the electric field E in a region without changing magnetic fields has zero curl (∇×E=0). This allows us to define an electric potential V such that E=−∇V.

What if the region is not simply connected?
If the domain has holes, a vector field with zero curl might not be the gradient of a single-valued scalar potential defined over the entire domain. A classic example is the vector field F(x,y)=(-y/(x^2+y^2, x/(x^2+y^2) in R^2∖{(0,0)} (the plane with the origin removed). Its curl is zero, but it’s not the gradient of a single-valued function over this domain because integrating it around a loop enclosing the origin gives a non-zero result.
So, Poincaré’s Lemma gives us a powerful tool for determining when a vector field can be derived from a scalar potential, provided the curl is zero and the domain is simply connected. It highlights the importance of the topology of the space where the vector field is defined.

Η ερώτηση που έκανα στο Gemini:
” tell me about Poincare’s lemma (inverse of curl)”
Μπορείτε επίσης να δείτε και τι απαντά το ChatGPT στην ερώτηση:
“Ιs this possible the curl of a force field to be zero in all domain and the field not to be conservative? What if the domain is a non simply connected region”?
https://chatgpt.com/share/6829d55f-9a84-800d-9717-6f778b3bc490

Άρη σε ευχαριστώ πολύ!
Πολύ σωστή η κίνηση σου!
Έτσι φαίνονται άμεσα τα βασικά συμπεράσματα!
Να είσαι πάντα καλά!